New U.K. Orphan Works Law Causes a Stir

by Sheldon Mak & Anderson on May 20, 2013

Los Angeles IP lawyerThe United Kingdom recently approved the Enterprise and Regulatory Act. Among other provisions, it amends how British copyright law treats “orphan works.”

The Enterprise and Regulatory Act defines an orphan work as a copyrighted work for which the copyright owner cannot be found “after a diligent search made in accordance with the regulations.” If the owner cannot be found, the law allows media publications or others to obtain a license to use the image. The copyright license fee is then held should the rights holder come forward.

As Wired reports, many commentators broadly interpreted the law to mean that pictures from popular social media sites like Facebook and Instagram would qualify as orphan works, as it can be difficult the owners’ real name and contact information. The new law caused such a stir that the Intellectual Property Office stepped in to clarify it.

"Owners of photographs posted online will not lose control of their copyright under changes outlined in the Act," said a spokesperson. "Nor do the changes mean anyone can use a copyright work without permission or free of charge. If someone copies a photo posted online they still need the permission from the rights holder of the photo to do so. If they don't have this permission they will have to apply for and buy an orphan works license."

Despite the Intellectual Property Office’s reassurances, critics of the law still contend that it will hurt photographers and other rights holders. They are specifically concerned with the stringency of the due diligence requirement for locating a work’s owners. The specific details of the licensing process are also still being flushed out with stakeholders. We will continue to monitor this legislation and provide updates as they become available.

At Sheldon Mak & Anderson, we recognize that innovation is your competitive edge - and it needs protection. Recognized as one of the country’s “Best Law Firms” by U.S. News and Best Lawyers, our attorneys possess more than two decades of experience. Our full-service IP firm provides local, regional, national, and international legal services in the following areas: patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, IP litigation, international patent and trademark prosecution, licensing, alternative dispute resolution, and green technology.

Contact our knowledgeable intellectual property attorneys today TOLL FREE at 1-855-UR IDEAS (1-855-874-3327) or email us at tri@usip.com to find out how we can provide powerful protection for your unique ideas.

We have offices conveniently located in Pasadena (626-796-4000, 100 Corson Street Third Floor, Pasadena, CA 91103-3842); Ventura County (805-988-0876, 300 East Esplanade Drive, Suite 1200, Oxnard, CA 93030-1247; Riverside (951-787-7770, 5885 Brockton Avenue, Riverside, CA 92506-1863); Upland (909-946-3939, 222 N. Mountain Avenue, Suite 210, Upland, CA 91786-5714); and Orange County (855-874-3327, 2102 Business Center Drive, Suite 130, Irvine, CA 92612-1001). 

{ 0 comments }

Which Countries Pose the Highest IP Risks to U.S. Businesses?

by Sheldon Mak & Anderson on May 17, 2013

Los Angeles patent attorneyUkraine was recently flagged by the Office of the United States Trade Representative as the worst abuser of U.S. intellectual property (IP) rights. The designation was part of the agency’s annual report on the adequacy and effectiveness of U.S. trading partners’ protection and enforcement of IP rights.

As explained by the U.S. Trade Representative, the agency designated Ukraine a Priority Foreign Country (PFC) due to severe deterioration of IP enforcement. Specifically referenced areas of concern included “government use of pirated software and piracy over the Internet, as well as denial of fair and equitable market access through the authorization and operation of copyright collecting societies.”

This was the first time in seven years that a country earned this designation. The PFC designation is reserved by statute for countries with the most egregious IP rights violations, policies and practices with the greatest adverse impact on relevant U.S. products, and that are not entering into good faith negotiations or making significant progress in negotiations to provide adequate and effective IPR protection. Under Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act, the United States is authorized to seek sanctions directly or through the World Trade Organization (WTO).

Ten countries – Algeria, Argentina, Chile, China, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Russia, Thailand, and Venezuela – are on the Priority Watch List, the U.S. Trade Representative’s second most egregious ranking. With regard to China, the report cites troubling “indigenous innovation” policies that may unfairly disadvantage U.S. rights holders and the growing problem of misappropriation of trade secrets.

As the report highlights, “Thefts may arise in a variety of circumstances, including those involving departing employees, failed joint ventures, cyber intrusion and hacking, and misuse of information submitted to government entities for purposes of complying with regulatory obligations.” The report also notes that “public reports have further indicated that actors affiliated with the Chinese military and Chinese Government have systematically infiltrated the computer systems of over one hundred U.S. companies and stolen hundreds of terabytes of data, including all forms of trade secrets, such as proprietary technology, manufacturing processes, and confidential business information.”

At Sheldon Mak & Anderson, we recognize that innovation is your competitive edge - and it needs protection. Recognized as one of the country’s “Best Law Firms” by U.S. News and Best Lawyers, our attorneys possess more than two decades of experience. Our full-service IP firm provides local, regional, national, and international legal services in the following areas: patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, IP litigation, international patent and trademark prosecution, licensing, alternative dispute resolution, and green technology.

Contact our knowledgeable intellectual property attorneys today TOLL FREE at 1-855-UR IDEAS (1-855-874-3327) or email us at tri@usip.com to find out how we can provide powerful protection for your unique ideas.

We have offices conveniently located in Pasadena (626-796-4000, 100 Corson Street Third Floor, Pasadena, CA 91103-3842); Ventura County (805-988-0876, 300 East Esplanade Drive, Suite 1200, Oxnard, CA 93030-1247; Riverside (951-787-7770, 5885 Brockton Avenue, Riverside, CA 92506-1863); Upland (909-946-3939, 222 N. Mountain Avenue, Suite 210, Upland, CA 91786-5714); and Orange County (855-874-3327, 2102 Business Center Drive, Suite 130, Irvine, CA 92612-1001). 

 

{ 0 comments }

Patent vs. Trade Secret Protection: Which One Is Better?

May 16, 2013

In some cases, trade secret protection of an invention is a viable alternative to patent protection. A trade secret is information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, that derives independent economic value from not being generally known to or readily ascertainable to others who might obtain economic value from its [...]

Read the full article →

EU Seeks to Modernize Trademark System

May 15, 2013

The European Union (EU) continues to announce ambitious initiatives to modernize its intellectual property laws. The latest proposal seeks to overhaul how the EU protects trademarks. In Europe, trademarks can be registered at national level or at EU level as a Community trademark (CTM). The two types of trademarks coexist, and the same mark may [...]

Read the full article →

Latest High-Profile Software Decision Tackles Standard-Essential Patents

May 14, 2013

Motorola (now owned by Google, Inc.) and Microsoft Corp. are the latest high-tech companies to square off in the so-called “patent wars.” In the lawsuit, Microsoft alleged Motorola tried to excise excessive licensing fees, while Motorola claimed that Microsoft infringed its standard-essential wireless technology patent. As we previously discussed on this IP Law Blog, standard-essential [...]

Read the full article →

Understanding Design Patents: A Primer

May 13, 2013

While design patents are not as popular as their utility patent peers, they still offer a number of benefits for inventors, particularly when seeking to protect the unique appearance of an item. In simple terms, a “design patent” protects the way an article looks, as opposed to how it is used or how it works. [...]

Read the full article →